Polish Language in Belarus is an Integral Part of Belarusian Culture
Kościuszko, Ogiński and Mickiewicz belong to Belarus just as they belong to Poland too
Language has always been an issue in Belarus. As a result of active Russification during 19th and 20th centuries, the country is now predominantly
During several past weeks the Belarusian journalists and bloggers from several independent newspapers and websites have been actively debating about bilingualism. The question was whether Russian language should be accepted as a language of Belarusian culture. Looking at this discussion it was impossible not to ask the logical question: is Polish language any worse than Russian in this respect?
Polish aristocrats have never ruled Belarus
We can say that Belarus as a country or region (or, rather, what now is being called Belarus because the name Belarus was not there even 100 or 150 years ago) got some postmodern features long before there the concept of postmodernism was even coined. Thus, see
the indigenous Belarusian elite that in the course of the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries adopted Polish language and converted to Roman Catholicism.As a result of this process, at the time when the population of the former Grand Duchy of Lithuania got separated into several nations during the era of nationalisms, most of the local nobility ended up being on the "Polish" side of this imagined border, while most of the population formed the modern "Belarusian" nation.
The fact that the «Polish» aristocracy of the Belarusian lands was in fact indigenous needs to be emphasized specifically.
Prominent Belarusian noble families like the Ogińskis or the Sapiehas are usually referred to as Polish but in fact have an Eastern Slavic origin.Even the ancestors of Tadeusz Kościuszko, the famous freedom fighter, were Eastern Orthodox Ruthenians. According to historian Anatoĺ Hryckievič, 80% of the gentry in Belarusian lands were of local origin, that is, descendants of the elite of the Duchy if Polack, Duchy of Turaŭ and Pinsk and other medieval Eastern Slavic states of the region which later became part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.
The cliche that a migrant Polish or Lithuanian gentry ruled over indigenous Belarusian peasants is simply wrong.
The local szlachta was not comprised of Polish migrants, it consisted of local Belarusian people. Cultural differences between the Belarusian gentry and the Belarusian peasantry of the 18th and 19th centuries were hardly larger than, for instance, the gap between the
Together with the elite, a larger part of the indigenous population of what is now Belarus also landed on the Polish side after the 19th century. This group now identifies itself as the Polish minority in Belarus. This comes despite the fact that the predominant majority of these people do not descend from migrants from Poland and have much stronger cultural and genetic ties with people nowadays known as Belarusians or (modern) Lithuanians.
Overcoming nationalist cliches in seeing the region
Almost from its very beginning,
the Belarusian national movement has treated the great Lithuanian dukes, the revolutionaries Tadeusz Kościuszko or Konstanty Kalinowski, the composer Michał Kleofas Ogiński or the painter Napoleon Orda as representatives of Belarus. And it is quite reasonable and correct to do sofrom the point of view that these people were representatives of the indigenous population of Belarus and not migrants.
Still, the traditional modernist Belarusian nationalism of the early 20th century was unable to be fully consistent in this regard. However, we can afford being consistent and state that
since these people are "Belarusians", then, obviously, their culture is a "Belarusian" culture as well.
The Polish language and the Polish culture of the
people like Michał Kleofas Ogiński, Stanisław Moniuszko or Adam Mickiewicz, definitely have the same right (and in some cases — an even stronger right) to be treated as a representation of Belarus and Belarusian culture along with modernlike Sviatlana Alieksijevič, Siarhiej Michalok and others.Russian-speakers
Moreover, Belarusians should also treat people like Lucjan Żeligowski, the head of the Republic of Central Lithuania, and even marshal Józef Pilsudski as their compatriots. These people have never renounced their roots, have never renounced the fact that they are indigenous inhabitants of what now is Belarus.
Being between West and East is an advantage
In the history of Belarus there have always been fractions of
Except for the
the Polish culture of Belarus was almost entirely destroyed (often — with the physical extermination or deportation of its representatives) by the Soviet regime.In the course of the 20th century the remainders of this culture became fully dependant from Warsaw. Most Roman Catholics of Belarus now identify themselves as ethnic Belarusians and the remaining Belarusian Poles eventually began to perceive themselves as a Polish diaspora.
It is now even less probable that the Polish culture of Belarus (together with the Polish culture of the
«If the West Detained Lukashenko's Agents, There Could Be an Exchange Fund.» Vechorko on Political Prisoners, Cabinet Staff Turnover, Border Situation, and Visas

Comments